PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.09%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 23.43%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
12.15%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -1.20%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-1300.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
14.86%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -7.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-109.18%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -5.18%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-320.21%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -223.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
7.33%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -36.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
72.73%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -78.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-75.90%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 87.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-517.86%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -2.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-17.54%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 15.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-34.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -1.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-50.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
38.29%
Purchases growth of 38.29% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
51.41%
Liquidation growth of 51.41% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
730.77%
Growth well above LSCC's 1.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
173.44%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -0.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.75%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 395.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-100.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -134.41%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.