PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.51%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 11.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.38%
Less D&A growth vs. LSCC's 8.29%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-5666.67%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-8.82%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-105.20%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 191.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-3.33%
AR is negative yoy while LSCC is 190.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-72.20%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 0.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-19.05%
Both negative yoy AP, with LSCC at -137.19%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-11.29%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 49.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-117.24%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -60.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-26.17%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 28.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-22.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -146.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
Purchases growth of 15.14% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
20.34%
Liquidation growth of 20.34% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-120.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -10.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
51.40%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -90.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
214.96%
Debt repayment above 1.5x LSCC's 86.67%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-35.90%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 286.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
14.86%
Buyback growth below 50% of LSCC's 49.98%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.