PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.95%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 7.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.84%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 3.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
95.38%
Deferred tax of 95.38% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
67.74%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -0.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-9488.89%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -635.81%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-87.59%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -50.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-50.42%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 59.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-464.71%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 25.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-236.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -267.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
1.59%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. LSCC's 24.42%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-43.19%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -45.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-1.55%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 17.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.30%
Purchases growth of 18.30% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
10.30%
Liquidation growth of 10.30% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
81.82%
Growth well above LSCC's 20.08%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
102.73%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 18.48%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-274.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -25.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
70.00%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -56.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
87.85%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x LSCC's 49.97%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.