PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.82%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -9.44%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.76%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -15.56%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-550.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
6.73%
Less SBC growth vs. LSCC's 50.75%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
40.90%
Well above LSCC's 66.52% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-538.89%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -280.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
16.95%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 183.37%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
159.68%
AP growth well above LSCC's 135.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
71.68%
Growth well above LSCC's 60.54%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-177.42%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 98.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.60%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 57.35%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-47.25%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 89.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-23.87%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
1150.00%
We have some outflow growth while LSCC is negative at -121.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-8617.86%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 39.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
64.21%
We repay more while LSCC is negative at -140.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-23.53%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 184.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
23.30%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x LSCC's 0.02%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.