205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.75%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 6.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.67%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -21.18%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-90.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.83%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -22.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
98.82%
Well above LSCC's 110.51% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
74.68%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -61.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
59.41%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 33.67%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-63.51%
Both negative yoy AP, with LSCC at -1139.67%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
359.38%
Growth well above LSCC's 162.24%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
61.63%
Well above LSCC's 50.47%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
38.46%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x LSCC's 16.38%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-3.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -384.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.89%
Purchases growth of 23.89% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-5.87%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-111.90%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 46.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
28.97%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -12.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x LSCC's 25.00%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
4.62%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -78.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
41.77%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x LSCC's 0.03%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.