PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.78%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 83.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.31%
Less D&A growth vs. LSCC's 102.36%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-41.41%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-13.92%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 6.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
4766.67%
Well above LSCC's 152.47% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
1045.00%
AR growth well above LSCC's 116.51%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
49.16%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -30.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-137.04%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 45.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
15.66%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -116.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
112.12%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -98.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-0.67%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -12.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
23.21%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -79.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-400.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
16.72%
Purchases growth of 16.72% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
18.23%
Liquidation growth of 18.23% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-20.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -35.82%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
81.64%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -5.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.82%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 270.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-41.30%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -400.04%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.