PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -85.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.42%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -16.21%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
49.29%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. LSCC's 100.87%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
55.88%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 3.96%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-227.14%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -592.30%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-38.62%
AR is negative yoy while LSCC is 252.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
7.69%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -33.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-670.00%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 40.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-261.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -1777.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1650.00%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 51471.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-47.14%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -59.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-8.71%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
6500.00%
Acquisition growth of 6500.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-89.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-22.87%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-566.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -2.03%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-970.42%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-57.09%
We cut debt repayment yoy while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
44.44%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -80.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
95.38%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x LSCC's 60.00%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.