PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.45%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 52.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.25%
Less D&A growth vs. LSCC's 22.72%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-19.72%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9.43%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -82.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
108.15%
Well above LSCC's 8.19% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-134.48%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -182.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
72.62%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -279.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
232.47%
AP growth well above LSCC's 233.15%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
96.78%
Growth well above LSCC's 76.73%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
102.42%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -11.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
54.47%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -25.69%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.74%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -34.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-98.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
56.87%
Purchases growth of 56.87% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
18.97%
Liquidation growth of 18.97% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
175.00%
Growth well above LSCC's 23.95%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
100.00%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -34.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
89.93%
Debt repayment growth of 89.93% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
281.54%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 762.57%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-2266.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 50.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.