205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.23%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -68.23%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.51%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 6.20%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
61.18%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. LSCC's 171.81%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-25.00%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 415.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-262.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 150.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-277.50%
AR is negative yoy while LSCC is 366.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-726.09%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 52.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-87.25%
Both negative yoy AP, with LSCC at -249.68%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
2910.00%
Growth well above LSCC's 118.67%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-1166.67%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -99.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
10.25%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 100.69%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-23.68%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 128.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
12.06%
Purchases growth of 12.06% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-13.74%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-186.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -280.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-993.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-52.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -83.58%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-347.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -70.02%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.