PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.07%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 129.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.21%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 2.30%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
36.36%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -3069.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-10.34%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -11.59%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
738.30%
Well above LSCC's 47.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
194.70%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -13.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-21.58%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 137.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
569.23%
AP growth well above LSCC's 266.21%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
7.12%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -670.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
103.13%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. LSCC's 27325.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
15.36%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.20%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
9.42%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.73%
Purchases growth of 50.73% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
10542.31%
Growth well above LSCC's 20.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
226.08%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -4.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
90.85%
Debt repayment growth of 90.85% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-25.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -78.50%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-68.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -17.64%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.