205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.16%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -69.59%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.53%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -11.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-314.29%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 102.61%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
48.72%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 38.84%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-341.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-198.60%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -133.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
30.74%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 669.65%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-239.08%
Both negative yoy AP, with LSCC at -195.68%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-200.33%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-6000.00%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -122.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-57.51%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -29.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
5.79%
CapEx growth of 5.79% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.82%
Purchases growth of 28.82% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.34%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 65.28%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
104.07%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -21.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-150.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
35.63%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 1244.58%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-21.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -25.01%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.