205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.97%
Negative net income growth while MCHP stands at 14.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.05%
Less D&A growth vs. MCHP's 1145.24%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-200.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MCHP stands at 101.11%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1342.86%
Slight usage while MCHP is negative at -44.78%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.85%
Some inventory rise while MCHP is negative at -11.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
476.74%
Some yoy usage while MCHP is negative at -57.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
464.29%
Some yoy increase while MCHP is negative at -87.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
38.54%
Some CFO growth while MCHP is negative at -7.53%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
36.06%
Some CapEx rise while MCHP is negative at -29.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.93%
Some yoy expansion while MCHP is negative at -129.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
1.24%
Below 50% of MCHP's 248.95%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.01%
Investing outflow well above MCHP's 101.19%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-277.55%
We cut yoy buybacks while MCHP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.