205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
52.55%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x MCHP's 38.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-0.55%
Negative yoy D&A while MCHP is 5.87%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-370.27%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
Well above MCHP's 90.98% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth well above MCHP's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
1333.33%
Some inventory rise while MCHP is negative at -83.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while MCHP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
67.36%
Growth well above MCHP's 89.59%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
1125.00%
Some yoy increase while MCHP is negative at -170.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
58.13%
Some CFO growth while MCHP is negative at -22.96%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
7.22%
Some CapEx rise while MCHP is negative at -51.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.02%
Purchases well above MCHP's 62.27%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-1.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MCHP at -77.49%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-130.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with MCHP at -52.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
348.32%
Investing outflow well above MCHP's 9.45%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
103.51%
We slightly raise equity while MCHP is negative at -5.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
13.46%
We have some buyback growth while MCHP is negative at -85.37%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.