PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.22%
Net income growth above 1.5x MCHP's 3.25%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.03%
Less D&A growth vs. MCHP's 4.11%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MCHP at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
70.93%
Slight usage while MCHP is negative at -121.80%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-100.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MCHP at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-153.57%
Negative yoy inventory while MCHP is 1367.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while MCHP is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
60.21%
Some yoy usage while MCHP is negative at -125.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
686.67%
Well above MCHP's 10.82%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
62.09%
Some CFO growth while MCHP is negative at -6.83%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.79%
Some CapEx rise while MCHP is negative at -15.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above MCHP's 59.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-74.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while MCHP stands at 95.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
51.73%
We have some liquidation growth while MCHP is negative at -95.24%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MCHP is 79.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-188.64%
We reduce yoy invests while MCHP stands at 90.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.86%
We slightly raise equity while MCHP is negative at -10.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
13.42%
Buyback growth of 13.42% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.