205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
106.92%
Some net income increase while MCHP is negative at -4.37%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.72%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MCHP at -3.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
1083.33%
Some yoy growth while MCHP is negative at -170.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-2.13%
Negative yoy SBC while MCHP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-68.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MCHP at -223.98%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-60.34%
AR is negative yoy while MCHP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-243.24%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MCHP at -461.68%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.00%
Some yoy usage while MCHP is negative at -204.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-160.00%
Both negative yoy, with MCHP at -296.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
49.73%
Some CFO growth while MCHP is negative at -102.02%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-370.83%
Negative yoy CapEx while MCHP is 48.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while MCHP is negative at -65.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-154.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with MCHP at -18.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-73.59%
We reduce yoy sales while MCHP is 3172.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-769.01%
We reduce yoy invests while MCHP stands at 138.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.95%
We slightly raise equity while MCHP is negative at -90.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-0.40%
We cut yoy buybacks while MCHP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.