205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.87%
Net income growth under 50% of MCHP's 62.54%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.79%
Some D&A expansion while MCHP is negative at -1.77%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
36.36%
Some yoy growth while MCHP is negative at -123.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
4.26%
SBC growth well above MCHP's 5.58%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-129.33%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MCHP is 760.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
25.10%
AR growth well above MCHP's 9.58%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
1.35%
Some inventory rise while MCHP is negative at -69.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-233.33%
Negative yoy AP while MCHP is 375.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-97.81%
Negative yoy usage while MCHP is 322.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.85%
Negative yoy CFO while MCHP is 11.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-29.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with MCHP at -59.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MCHP at -214.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
43.04%
Similar to MCHP's 47.50%. Walter Schloss finds parallel timing in investment disposals or maturities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
500.00%
We have mild expansions while MCHP is negative at -244.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.81%
We cut yoy buybacks while MCHP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.