PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.76%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MCHP at -7.10%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.67%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MCHP at -0.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
73.33%
Some yoy growth while MCHP is negative at -3207.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-7.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MCHP at -5.41%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
242.42%
Slight usage while MCHP is negative at -99.51%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1160.00%
AR growth while MCHP is negative at -199.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
16.67%
Some inventory rise while MCHP is negative at -24.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
176.47%
AP growth well above MCHP's 157.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-91.45%
Negative yoy usage while MCHP is 141.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-390.91%
Both negative yoy, with MCHP at -47.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
4.17%
Some CFO growth while MCHP is negative at -3.03%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
13.71%
Some CapEx rise while MCHP is negative at -49.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-13.71%
Negative yoy acquisition while MCHP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
5.81%
Some yoy expansion while MCHP is negative at -68.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
0.15%
Below 50% of MCHP's 102.78%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
35.54%
We have some outflow growth while MCHP is negative at -13.28%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
41.98%
Investing outflow well above MCHP's 66.52%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.86%
Negative yoy issuance while MCHP is 107.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.