PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while MCHP stands at 31.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.08%
Some D&A expansion while MCHP is negative at -20.78%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-171.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MCHP stands at 128.81%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
18.18%
SBC growth while MCHP is negative at -5.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-214.16%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MCHP is 6880.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-146.86%
AR is negative yoy while MCHP is 95.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
440.00%
Some inventory rise while MCHP is negative at -174.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-1000.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with MCHP at -77.82%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-1161.54%
Negative yoy usage while MCHP is 58.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
117.19%
Some yoy increase while MCHP is negative at -36.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-61.47%
Negative yoy CFO while MCHP is 31.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
28.04%
Some CapEx rise while MCHP is negative at -88.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MCHP at -110.58%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-43.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with MCHP at -10.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
14.60%
We have some liquidation growth while MCHP is negative at -46.11%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
148.72%
Growth well above MCHP's 14.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-147.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with MCHP at -1211.64%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.45%
We slightly raise equity while MCHP is negative at -3.53%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
1.91%
Buyback growth of 1.91% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.