PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.20%
Some net income increase while MCHP is negative at -48.91%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.00%
Less D&A growth vs. MCHP's 10.36%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-112.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MCHP stands at 126.76%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.36%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MCHP at -7.04%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
24.31%
Slight usage while MCHP is negative at -71.07%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
266.67%
AR growth well above MCHP's 2.82%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-25.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MCHP at -53.29%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
211.54%
A yoy AP increase while MCHP is negative at -196.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-40.30%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MCHP at -88.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
141.82%
Some yoy increase while MCHP is negative at -11.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
10.91%
Some CFO growth while MCHP is negative at -1.23%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
47.54%
CapEx growth well above MCHP's 61.94%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-47.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with MCHP at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-312.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while MCHP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
10.00%
We have some liquidation growth while MCHP is negative at -102.17%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
32.42%
Growth well above MCHP's 60.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-254.26%
We reduce yoy invests while MCHP stands at 54.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.88%
We slightly raise equity while MCHP is negative at -52.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
47.16%
Buyback growth of 47.16% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.