205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.06%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -0.05%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
503.40%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -1377.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
83.58%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -7.31%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-48.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -19.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-9.43%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 90.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
37.98%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -50.26%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.45%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MPWR's 93.86%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
933.33%
Issuance growth of 933.33% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
41.67%
We have some buyback growth while MPWR is negative at -169.11%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.