205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-185.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MPWR at -0.05%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
10.42%
D&A growth well above MPWR's 14.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-133.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 2.11%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.46%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -39.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.63%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -1.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.45%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -71.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
138.10%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -1377.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
392.44%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -7.31%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
62.00%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -19.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.35%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 90.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
16.62%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -50.26%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.91%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 93.86%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.14%
Issuance growth of 7.14% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-2057.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -169.11%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.