205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1.69%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -0.05%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
8.51%
D&A growth well above MPWR's 14.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
245.45%
Well above MPWR's 2.11% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.93%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -39.62%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -1.87%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-156.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -71.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
171.66%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -1377.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
133.53%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -7.31%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
24.36%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -19.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 90.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
19.15%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -50.26%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.71%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 93.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Issuance growth of 200.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
44.08%
We have some buyback growth while MPWR is negative at -169.11%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.