205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
258.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 114.49%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
2.36%
Some D&A expansion while MPWR is negative at -57.14%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
320.25%
Deferred tax of 320.25% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
273.58%
Well above MPWR's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.00%
Inventory growth of 120.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
255.86%
Growth of 255.86% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-214.71%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 115.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
109.22%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 131.25%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-17.17%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 76.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.10%
Purchases growth of 11.10% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
13.91%
Liquidation growth of 13.91% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
82.81%
Growth well above MPWR's 143.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
75.32%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 127.78%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
352.94%
Issuance growth of 352.94% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-91.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 300.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.