205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.16%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 74.99%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.09%
Some D&A expansion while MPWR is negative at -33.33%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
600.00%
Deferred tax of 600.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.53%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -104.69%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
16.46%
Inventory growth of 16.46% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-2988.89%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -104.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.75%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 40.91%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
11.22%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -66.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.43%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
13.68%
Liquidation growth of 13.68% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 111.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
7.96%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MPWR's 101.79%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
64.29%
Issuance growth of 64.29% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
34.30%
We have some buyback growth while MPWR is negative at -50.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.