205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
52.55%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -372.09%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.55%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 2.38%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-370.27%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
Less working capital growth vs. MPWR's 941.66%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth well above MPWR's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
1333.33%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 112.96%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
67.36%
Growth well above MPWR's 100.96%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
1125.00%
Well above MPWR's 99.49%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
58.13%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 94.64%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
7.22%
CapEx growth well above MPWR's 4.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.02%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -2211.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-1.00%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 1768.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-130.95%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 99.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
348.32%
We have mild expansions while MPWR is negative at -249.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
103.51%
Stock issuance far above MPWR's 175.54%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
13.46%
Buyback growth of 13.46% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.