205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.64%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 240.16%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.72%
Some D&A expansion while MPWR is negative at -46.80%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
163.22%
Well above MPWR's 183.98% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
840.00%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -159.87%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.33%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 345.41%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
375.64%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -165.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
179.59%
Well above MPWR's 38.35%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
83.07%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MPWR's 218.60%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-75.10%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 72.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-726.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -2.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-0.50%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 8.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
Growth well above MPWR's 196.15%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-304.19%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 215.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.93%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MPWR's 119.32%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
61.61%
Buyback growth of 61.61% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.