205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
308.03%
Net income growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 359.80%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
-1.58%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 30.66%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-13.89%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 991.30%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-34.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -3351.35%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth while MPWR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-56.14%
Negative yoy inventory while MPWR is 77.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-804.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -180.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-2998.00%
Both negative yoy, with MPWR at -38.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.72%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -312.09%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
8.33%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -19.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
84.18%
Acquisition growth of 84.18% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-165.98%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 71.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-15.46%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MPWR at -76.38%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
49700.00%
Growth well above MPWR's 100.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
146.91%
We have mild expansions while MPWR is negative at -21.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
11.58%
Debt repayment growth of 11.58% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-3.52%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 184.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
27.99%
Buyback growth of 27.99% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.