205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-70.63%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MPWR at -276.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.29%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MPWR at -2.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-12.20%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.03%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MPWR is 177.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.28%
Negative yoy inventory while MPWR is 417.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.79%
Negative yoy usage while MPWR is 162.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
102.19%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MPWR's 207.78%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-34.43%
Negative yoy CFO while MPWR is 295.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
26.20%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MPWR's 83.05%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while MPWR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
56.46%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -719.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
30.23%
Below 50% of MPWR's 865.76%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -11800.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-34.55%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 68.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-35.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -53.14%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-63.45%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.