205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.71%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 12.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-6.51%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 1657.51%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-67.39%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 6640.74%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.78%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -98.55%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.62%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -61.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.14%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -104.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-617.65%
Both negative yoy, with MPWR at -515.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
101.67%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -60.87%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
22.46%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -114.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.40%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -15.99%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-41.55%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 54.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.00%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 1336.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 7.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
33.33%
Buyback growth of 33.33% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.