205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.22%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -10380.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.03%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 13.94%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
70.93%
Less working capital growth vs. MPWR's 860.06%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-100.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-153.57%
Negative yoy inventory while MPWR is 1.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
60.21%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MPWR's 1044.13%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
686.67%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MPWR's 2786.60%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
62.09%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -46.80%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.79%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -60.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while MPWR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-74.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 33.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
51.73%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -40.63%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-188.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -167.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.86%
We slightly raise equity while MPWR is negative at -41.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
13.42%
Buyback growth of 13.42% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.