205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
27.21%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 229.71%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.68%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 9.33%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
1300.00%
Well above MPWR's 109.33% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
579.12%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -232.33%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.67%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -50.95%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
718.42%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -154.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-114.77%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 20.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
70.49%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MPWR's 28.56%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
12.64%
CapEx growth well above MPWR's 17.05%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -90.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-10.17%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 79.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3150.00%
We have some outflow growth while MPWR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-410.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -53.38%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-55.61%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 244.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-89.89%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.