205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.46%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 36.57%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.45%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 1.00%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-116.67%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 775.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.30%
SBC growth while MPWR is negative at -3.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-1385.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -183.33%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-260.90%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MPWR at -327.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
13.95%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 593.02%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.86%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -250.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 4.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-29.07%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MPWR at -48.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
49.77%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -21.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.02%
Purchases well above MPWR's 16.13%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
24.03%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MPWR's 14.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.17%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 53.19%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 84.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-43.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.