205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
68.30%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 120.10%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-0.61%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 3.89%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
625.00%
Well above MPWR's 97.84% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-7.25%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 15.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-10.48%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -148.08%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-339.68%
AR is negative yoy while MPWR is 69.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
64.84%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -447.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-251.35%
Both negative yoy AP, with MPWR at -55.73%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
155.86%
Growth well above MPWR's 142.19%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.33%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -2.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-41.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -70.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-70.78%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 24.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.18%
At 75-90% of MPWR's 53.46%. Bill Ackman would push for additional sales if those assets are non-strategic or have peaked in value.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
18.89%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MPWR's 75.55%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-91.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-73.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -15.78%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.