205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
75.78%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -10.18%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
466.67%
Some yoy growth while MPWR is negative at -46.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-221.88%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 9.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
110.78%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -65.80%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
111.92%
AR growth well above MPWR's 90.06%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
215.63%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 59.92%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
3.85%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -296.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
17.28%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -1770.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-48.98%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 98.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
78.07%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -80.93%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-2.74%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 27.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-257.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 22.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-78.12%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MPWR at -36.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-548.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -44.25%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
13.04%
Debt repayment growth of 13.04% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-7.35%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 45.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.