PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 34.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.96%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 8.23%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
155.56%
Well above MPWR's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-5.33%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 0.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
131.94%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -740.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
81.25%
AR growth while MPWR is negative at -169.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
70.00%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 48.89%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
52.78%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -250.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
261.70%
Growth well above MPWR's 523.38%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
833.33%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -316.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
70.77%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -48.29%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.84%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 37.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
27.84%
Acquisition growth of 27.84% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
58.49%
Purchases well above MPWR's 3.54%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-69.92%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 8.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-24.74%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 95.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-168.39%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 33.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1.75%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MPWR's 159.57%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-1.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.