205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.76%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 1.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.67%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MPWR at -1.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
73.33%
Deferred tax of 73.33% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-7.04%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 7.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
242.42%
Less working capital growth vs. MPWR's 552.25%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
1160.00%
AR growth while MPWR is negative at -8.37%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
16.67%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 219.70%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
176.47%
AP growth well above MPWR's 109.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-91.45%
Negative yoy usage while MPWR is 197.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-390.91%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 103.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
4.17%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MPWR's 279.60%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
13.71%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MPWR's 92.65%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-13.71%
Negative yoy acquisition while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
5.81%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -188.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
0.15%
Below 50% of MPWR's 78.77%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
35.54%
Growth well above MPWR's 0.32%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
41.98%
We have mild expansions while MPWR is negative at -254.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -68.29%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.