205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.08%
Some D&A expansion while MPWR is negative at -0.56%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-171.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
18.18%
SBC growth well above MPWR's 35.20%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-214.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -156.09%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-146.86%
AR is negative yoy while MPWR is 194.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
440.00%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -102.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-1000.00%
Negative yoy AP while MPWR is 283.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-1161.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -185.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
117.19%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -53.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-61.47%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MPWR at -60.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
28.04%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -1228.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-43.97%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 33.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
14.60%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -14.84%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
148.72%
We have some outflow growth while MPWR is negative at -4680.84%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-147.97%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 39.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.45%
We slightly raise equity while MPWR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
1.91%
Buyback growth below 50% of MPWR's 10.16%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.