PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.94%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 75.39%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.33%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 8.66%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
52.63%
Deferred tax of 52.63% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-19.48%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 5.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
165.88%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -198.83%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
125.45%
AR growth while MPWR is negative at -543.64%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
76.67%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 75.07%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
18.64%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -53.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
18200.00%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -181.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
130.00%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -1.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
78.45%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -37.47%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-28.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -22.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
28.75%
Acquisition growth of 28.75% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-69.64%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 64.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-68.16%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MPWR at -60.49%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-18.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -371.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-147.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -443.48%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-45.60%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
9.83%
Buyback growth below 50% of MPWR's 26.19%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.