205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.10%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 32.47%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.69%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MPWR at -4.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-5800.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
7.69%
SBC growth well above MPWR's 3.02%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
46.99%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -261.68%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
74.03%
AR growth while MPWR is negative at -596.50%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
31.67%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 7.26%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
68.52%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -132.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-12.90%
Negative yoy usage while MPWR is 89.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
471.43%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -2078.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
34.65%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -51.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1.63%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 58.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -17.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
39.84%
At 50-75% of MPWR's 67.42%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
-11600.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 72.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-210.13%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 53.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.27%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
2.39%
Buyback growth below 50% of MPWR's 25.77%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.