205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.76%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -9.75%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-8.42%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MPWR at -2.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
202.00%
Deferred tax of 202.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-12.12%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 18.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
51.38%
Less working capital growth vs. MPWR's 261.30%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
776.60%
AR growth well above MPWR's 90.41%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-29.82%
Negative yoy inventory while MPWR is 277.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
104.17%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -197.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-85.61%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -42.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1175.00%
Both negative yoy, with MPWR at -429.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
1.49%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MPWR's 10.37%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-17.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -333.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
17.99%
Acquisition growth of 17.99% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-129.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -17.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-55.41%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 49.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
56.06%
We have some outflow growth while MPWR is negative at -574.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-273.52%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 41.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-33.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
214.29%
Issuance growth of 214.29% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
20.63%
Buyback growth below 50% of MPWR's 95.95%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.