205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.95%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 4.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-4.60%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 0.45%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-52.94%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
24.14%
SBC growth while MPWR is negative at -27.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-206.15%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MPWR is 79.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-131.45%
AR is negative yoy while MPWR is 661.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-242.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -79.58%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy AP while MPWR is 198.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-479.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -104.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
129.30%
Well above MPWR's 98.50%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-54.34%
Negative yoy CFO while MPWR is 18.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.39%
CapEx growth well above MPWR's 29.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
81.02%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -32.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
105.95%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -36.17%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
94.83%
Growth well above MPWR's 77.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
184.89%
We have mild expansions while MPWR is negative at -866.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to MPWR's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-38.18%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-0.48%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.