205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.70%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.17%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MPWR at -0.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-700.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
10.29%
Less SBC growth vs. MPWR's 29.71%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
17.19%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -14.72%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-94.12%
AR is negative yoy while MPWR is 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-96.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -99.82%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
115.38%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -42.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
38.49%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MPWR's 384.86%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
131.25%
Well above MPWR's 85.59%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
15.35%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 13.64%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-18.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -399.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.27%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 70.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.95%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -35.40%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-561.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 70.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-103.00%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 56.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-47.83%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-18.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.