205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.69%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 57.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.30%
Some yoy growth while MPWR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-28.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MPWR at -7.65%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
140.76%
Well above MPWR's 15.49% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
19.70%
AR growth while MPWR is negative at -127.12%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
137.50%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 48.76%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
291.67%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -197.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
205.85%
Growth well above MPWR's 85.84%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-110.00%
Both negative yoy, with MPWR at -345.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
87.79%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MPWR's 35.37%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-23.18%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 73.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
23.18%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. MPWR's 100.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-7.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 58.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.27%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 21.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-32.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -46.81%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-6000.00%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 126.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-9.52%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.