205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
297.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 81.06%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
2.23%
Some D&A expansion while MPWR is negative at -31.28%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-119.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
55.56%
SBC growth well above MPWR's 26.75%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-141.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -158.42%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-158.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MPWR at -187.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-97.96%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -2237.52%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-172.86%
Negative yoy AP while MPWR is 300.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-118.17%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -113.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-282.14%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 434.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-42.35%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MPWR at -69.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
18.18%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MPWR's 81.80%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
31.31%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -24.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
84.18%
At 75-90% of MPWR's 96.30%. Bill Ackman would push for additional sales if those assets are non-strategic or have peaked in value.
98.32%
Growth well above MPWR's 58.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
129.62%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 61.95%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
9.88%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MPWR's 37009.52%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-23.65%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.