PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 10.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.75%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 11.62%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
103.23%
Deferred tax of 103.23% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
5.71%
SBC growth well above MPWR's 5.73%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
132.91%
Well above MPWR's 25.20% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
44.89%
AR growth well above MPWR's 52.97%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
40.21%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -35.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
111.76%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -121.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
306.80%
Growth well above MPWR's 230.03%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
17.65%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -82.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
64.21%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 56.02%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-31.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 24.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 59.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-5.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MPWR at -35.63%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-5975.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 129.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-130.45%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 81.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-16.61%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.