205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.74%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 30.41%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.29%
D&A growth well above MPWR's 4.98%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 26208.33%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-37.84%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MPWR at -6.59%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
94.19%
Well above MPWR's 98.63% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
64.95%
AR growth while MPWR is negative at -23.08%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
55.17%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 53.60%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
750.00%
AP growth well above MPWR's 457.52%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
1.97%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MPWR's 113.32%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
95.24%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -567.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.33%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MPWR's 105.17%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-48.59%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 9.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
48.59%
Acquisition growth of 48.59% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-155.48%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 2.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
24.73%
Below 50% of MPWR's 63.13%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-58.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -224.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-2082.72%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 273.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-46.08%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-17.88%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.