205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.23%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -20.96%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.49%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 14.87%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
675.00%
Well above MPWR's 139.39% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
9.84%
Less SBC growth vs. MPWR's 41.84%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
139.52%
Well above MPWR's 46.14% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
109.01%
AR growth well above MPWR's 195.21%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-39.53%
Negative yoy inventory while MPWR is 83.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
61.19%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -154.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
154.92%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -926.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-320.00%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 70.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
62.24%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MPWR's 13.44%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-13.15%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 67.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.40%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-87.37%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 6.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1890.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -195.80%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-121.99%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 63.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-3.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
25.09%
Buyback growth of 25.09% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.