205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.72%
Net income growth similar to MPWR's 10.23%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 710.38%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
53.66%
SBC growth while MPWR is negative at -0.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-247.40%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -307.10%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-190.30%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MPWR at -129.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-105.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -149.24%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
303.45%
AP growth well above MPWR's 274.18%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-505.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -596.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-190.91%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 625.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-51.48%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MPWR at -15.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.23%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -14.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
68.79%
Purchases well above MPWR's 4.32%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
437.05%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MPWR's 27.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
96.79%
Growth well above MPWR's 65.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
143.00%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 18.41%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
0.13%
Debt repayment growth of 0.13% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
204.17%
We slightly raise equity while MPWR is negative at -29.38%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-235.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -42.26%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.