205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.55%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -15.63%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.40%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 4.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
11.76%
Some yoy growth while MPWR is negative at -100.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
9.52%
SBC growth well above MPWR's 13.37%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
106.69%
Well above MPWR's 144.16% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
157.85%
AR growth well above MPWR's 51.50%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-6550.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -415.42%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
23.73%
AP growth well above MPWR's 15.57%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
87.54%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MPWR's 219.52%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
125.00%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -169.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
102.12%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MPWR's 15.39%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
19.25%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -46.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.46%
Purchases well above MPWR's 13.29%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
10.50%
Below 50% of MPWR's 50.18%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-2380.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 23.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
73.97%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 50.88%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
33.24%
Debt repayment growth of 33.24% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-40.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
46.25%
We have some buyback growth while MPWR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.