205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.15%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 21.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.49%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 28.78%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-112.50%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
13.11%
SBC growth well above MPWR's 12.40%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
67.77%
Less working capital growth vs. MPWR's 205.30%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
95.88%
AR growth well above MPWR's 137.81%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-38.46%
Negative yoy inventory while MPWR is 88.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-124.64%
Both negative yoy AP, with MPWR at -105.34%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
52.00%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -102.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-2750.00%
Both negative yoy, with MPWR at -108.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.65%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 25.81%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-25.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -107.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.83%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MPWR's 73.29%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
22.75%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -36.12%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-1878.95%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 7.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
111.45%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 62.08%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-72.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -83.31%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-46.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.